Hand in Hand, made with 17 photos.
Cory Arcangel’s pieces consist primarily of hacked and re-coded video games, spliced videos, and sculptures that reference pop culture. He got his start on Nintendo NES cartridges by removing all aspects of games like Super Mario Bros and just leaving a slow byproduct of it, like the clouds in the background moving slowly and aimlessly across the screen. His shows consist of reworked popular culture such as video games, movies and music, and functions on Photoshop.
His art is really interesting, although it took me a minute to understand what I was looking at. I didn’t understand why he would just re-purpose Mario clouds, but the effect of doing so is almost peaceful. It’s just clouds, small and digital, floating by on their blank blue space. His use of simple designs, like the rainbow images, are bold but not difficult to understand. After all, it’s just a function in Photoshop that made it happen.
His sculptures, too, are unique and reflect the idea of the 2000s. The rotating displays really interested me mostly because, upon scrolling past them, their shape seemed to distort the image in which they were held. Their design is intended to be dynamic, but even the image still reflected their unusual moving capability.
Rashaad Newsome has some interesting styles. His website features his digital works, including videos and pictures of his collages. He uses all kinds of different media (including remote controls) to create his pieces. His works are expressive and entrancing, showing parts of the world that you might not see if they were still attached to their original context.
When I was first researching Newsome, I had a hard time understanding what was going on. I pulled up his website and (on mute) skipped around the first video that showed up. Of course, after doing a little more research, I decided to play the video all the way through and listen to the content. And it was so strange and beautiful. The people standing on the stage were using expressions of frustration, annoyance, disappointment, and anger that I have never seen in such a detached, controlled environment. The faces and gestures of the performers reflected exactly what their sounds meant, and its gradual amplification was hypnotizing.
After watching this performance, I started to really understand and enjoy the rest of Newsome’s works. His representation of life and contextualization of his works stuck with me. His works are something incredibly genuine and artistic in a way that’s both complex and easy to understand — once you unmute the video.
While looking up Matt Siber, I found that most of his work revolves around highways and the objects you would find around them. From steel girders to signs against the road, he took what he found and touched it with a hint of surrealism. The signs now float, the steel is a stoplight, the gas station is only a shelter.
I love art made of industrial materials and styles, so these works hit home with me pretty quickly. Siber takes it to the next level by removing some parts or another to recreate a new vision with the same materials. The Red/Green sculptures imitate traffic lights without hanging from a wire, the Cheese sign hangs ominously in the sky, telling you what you need to know without the support of its home object. The Lighted Shelter is a little world that smells like gas despite it looking entirely clean. I love the detached world that Siber makes in his art.
Nam June Paik is considered the “Father of Video Art”, according to the Smithsonian’s page on him. His art consists largely of TV sculptures that form different shapes. The TVs usually remain on and reflect the sculpture itself, becoming a part of the art in its own way.
The sculptures and video art pieces were an innovative way to use video as a medium when the practice was brand new. His works inspired many people to create digital works that have physical forms and visual interpretations.
Works like this Electronic Superhighway capture America in laser lighting as well as imagery within the televisions, making the piece twofold in terms of its identity. Each set of screens within a state reflect the culture one might find there, making the piece glow and create a world unlike any other.
Works like these inspired bright, vibrant, and sometimes chilling recreations of the technology that was taking the world by storm, like this “TV Cello” piece that could actually be played. Its sound is nothing like one would expect from a simple string instrument, and the video itself is eerie and artistic in its angles and focuses between the sounds, cellist, and cello screens which also show the cellist playing it.
These pieces are incredibly interesting to look at and research, having no precedent. The US map caught my eye mostly due to the bright colors of the borders. It kept my attention, however, when I started looking at the various screens, trying to find imagery I recognized in the states I knew. Its captivating images are interesting and overall just nice to look at. Upon looking up information about Nam June Paik, I read about the cello before seeing it. I thought it was just a sculpture at first, but then I stumbled upon the video. The sounds it made were unexpected (although it’s obviously not a real cello, so I don’t know what I was expecting), but its eeriness similarly drew me in and I thought it would be valuable to show to others. The lengths to which Paik went to create not only a TV Cello, but one that can be played and has functional screens, is beyond impressive. His works are innovative and original even after the years we have had with the technology that he started with.
I see digital art in many forms, and as someone who doesn’t study art as my main focus in life I often find virtually any creative expression — with evident effort and thought put into it — a work of art. The same applies for digital art, which comes in all kinds of formats that can be quirky and peculiar but nonetheless artistic. From photoshopped images to digital paintings, ridiculous memes to years-long webcomics, digital art comes in myriad forms. All of it remains valid and thoughtful (despite its otherwise ridiculous appearance).
Digital art shares a great deal of characteristics with traditional art: they both require certain media in order to create their pieces (brushes, canvas, Photoshop, drawing tablets, etc.), they need hours of practice to understand and perfect the art and style, they can be studied and appreciated by wide audiences, and the list goes on. Digital art specifically, however, is unique in its portability, accessibility, and interactivity. In many cases, artists can take their laptops and work on projects practically anywhere and then publish it whenever convenient. Once published, anyone who has access to the content can view it immediately. And, best of all, some projects can be interactive and involve its viewers. The people who enjoy the art can contact the creators and express themselves (for better or for worse). Some projects, like video games or webcomics, can bring the consumer into the fold by giving them the chance to manipulate the content of the artist’s final product. Traditional art doesn’t usually go to the lengths of making its viewers feel personally involved in the project.
I’m a big webcomic reader, so my aesthetic and artistic influence in general comes largely from the webcomic creators I follow. A comic called Monsterkind holds a special place in my heart for its cartoonish style and important message. Everything about the comic speaks to my personal style — the characters’ color schemes and geometry, the artistic development of the creator, and the message underlying the story all create a world in which the readers can enjoy and learn from the story. As a webcomic, its release goes at a rate of two pages a week, but it’s definitely worth the wait. The art is almost entirely digital, produced with a drawing tablet and digital art program, and each page takes several hours to create.
Another artist that greatly inspires me is Vitaly S. Alexius, a Toronto-based artist and photographer (who also runs a webcomic called Romantically Apocalyptic). Much of his best-known works come from photos of decrepit buildings and abandoned areas that leave an eerie but beautiful scene.
For his webcomic, he paints his own scenes, although the characters are people who are costumed and photographed in front of a green screen. Then, once they are put into the painted scene, they get painted over as well to fit the picture. This makes the characters look incredibly realistic without being obviously photographed and leaves an artistic style that’s unique in its own sense.
The final project that stuck out to me as I was doing some research came from our own professor. Last semester he had students create a digital piece that they projected onto a tree on campus. Taking the hard-worked digital creations of students and then “publishing” them on an organic, public space feels surreal in its own nature. Yet at the same time it’s so unique to see a tree wrapped up in digital art. Street paintings are not difficult to come across, either in cities or online, but I had never seen a digital work painted on an organic “canvas” before.